[W]e need to give up our (often unconscious) fantasy that Obama was our messiah who would save us and the world, we can and must still retain our understanding that the suffering in this world through poverty and oppression, the destruction of the environment and the possibility of ending all human and animal life on the planet Earth, and the survival of our own souls and mental health requires that we revive a movement based on love, kindness, generosity, ecological sanity, and caring for each other, including everyone on the planet. And, indeed, were the Democrats to put those values at the forefront of their own reelection campaigns, they’d be far more successful than trying to defend policies or legislation that has been more about compromising with the powerful than promoting a fundamentally different kind of world.
So, they want to save our souls and place the emphasis on love, kindness, generosity and caring for others? Great!
But is seems that the worlds great religions have talked about this for centuries. What has got in the way is that human nature dictates that people look out for themselves and their families first. Which is the attitude that the liberals say they want to get rid of.
Supposedly, according to Rabbi Lerner, the liberals are immune to this. And to prove it to us, they’re going to get rid of all these things by passing laws against them.
But the one thing that has made the Constitution last so long is that it was written with the understanding of the frailties of human nature. That’s why there are the checks and balances. James Madison, the father of the Constitution said in Federalist No. 51;
T]he great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department, consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments of the others. The provision for defence must in this, as in all other cases, be made commensurate to the danger of attack. Ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place. It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions. ( n.d., 337)
So the good Rabbi argues that men are not angels, but Liberals are?
It would seem that all things good are attributed to Liberals and Progressive and all things evil to Conservatives and Libertarians simply by self-acclamation. It would also seem that the Liberals hold themselves to be Holy Knights who fight for right and all others are heathens who must be eliminated or subjugated.
The problem they’re having is that their earthly paradise can only be achieved and maintained by force. There is no way to do these things any other way. Dissent cannot be allowed because dissent sows doubt and absolute faith is required in order to sustain paradise. Each must toil and be rewarded in kind with each other. All must be equal, but some must be more equal than others since there has to be direction.
The way Rabbi Lerner wishes can only lead not to “love, kindness, generosity, ecological sanity, and caring for each other” but the age old destructive values of envy, greed and resentment.